Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Jeff Sessions and Marijuana

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    lived in 5 states traveled extensively in Europe middle East and Asia.
    Posts
    14,680
    Thanks
    1,977
    Thanked 2,022 Times in 1,640 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Jeff Sessions and Marijuana

    Rep. Carlos Curbelo is a two-term Republican from a South Florida district that was once the epicenter in the country’s war on drugs. But last month Curbelo, one of a new generation of Cuban-Americans in Congress, did something that, not too many years ago, would have been unthinkable. He co-sponsored a bill that is the top priority for the nation’s booming marijuana industry.

    Dubbed the Small Business Tax Equity Act, Curbelo’s bill would let legal pot dealers take advantage of the same tax deductions and credits as any other business, a move that industry experts say would slash the effective tax rates for weed dispensaries in half.

    “One of my goals in Congress is to ensure the law treats all enterprises with fairness and equity,” he said in a statement explaining his decision to join a liberal Oregon Democrat, Earl Blumenauer, in co-sponsoring the measure.

    It didn’t hurt Curbelo that his move won instant plaudits from influential GOP tax reform guru Grover Norquist — a longtime champion of legalized pot — who decries the “arbitrary and punitive” treatment of legal marijuana dealers in the tax code. Nor is it likely to hurt Curbelo back home: Last November, 71 percent of Florida voters approved a medical marijuana measure on the ballot, making the Sunshine State one of the latest in a long line of states that have either legalized pot altogether or allow it to be sold for medicinal purposes.

    “Look — it’s increasingly clear people in our country are accepting of marijuana,” Curbelo said in an interview with Yahoo News. “Millions and millions of voters have decided they want marijuana use to be legal for medical purposes or, in some cases, for recreational purposes. For those of us who are small-“c” conservatives who believe in the Tenth Amendment, we should defer to the people of Florida and other states … we shouldn’t get in the way.”

    The efforts of Republicans like Curbelo and Norquist are one reason why Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ hopes of reimposing strict enforcement of federal marijuana laws are likely to meet strong bipartisan resistance — and may ultimately go nowhere. Ever since he took over the Justice Department, the 70-year-old Sessions, an unrepentant drug warrior, has made clear his disdain for pot. “I don’t think America is going to be a better place when people of all ages, and particularly young people, are smoking pot,” he told reporters in February shortly after being sworn in.

    And now Sessions seems to be doing something about it. He released a memo to the country’s U.S. attorneys unveiling a Task Force on Crime Reduction and Public Safety whose mission is to review department policies on charging, sentencing and the current enforcement of marijuana laws.


    “Everything is on the table; we’ll be looking at everything,” said a senior department official when asked what the task force’s goals will be when it comes to marijuana enforcement. The official, however, declined to offer any clues to what Sessions specifically has in mind, saying little more than “we may be able to say something more by June.”

    To be sure, the sale and even possession of marijuana remains a federal crime, punishable by prison time and hefty fines — even in states that have repealed their own pot prohibitions. But just how far Sessions will be able to go in implementing his anti-pot agenda is far from clear, given the shifting political winds on the issue. Thanks to changing cultural attitudes and the steady march of legalization initiatives at the state level, the pro-pot cause is only gaining momentum, making it increasingly harder for foes like Sessions to slow it down, much less stop it.

    It’s not even clear Sessions will get the cooperation of his fellow cabinet members. Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly, questioned on “Meet the Press” Sunday, said that marijuana is “not a factor” in the country’s drug problems and that “arresting a lot of users” was not the answer.

    “It’s absolutely powerful now. This is a political movement,” said Norquist, who is quietly lobbying to get Curbelo’s proposal slipped into the massive tax reform bill that President Trump wants Congress to pass by this summer. “There are now guys in coats and ties making the case — not just guys in tie-dyed T-shirts.”

    The strength of that movement was underscored recently after White House press secretary Sean Spicer first suggested that the Trump administration was looking at “greater enforcement” of the marijuana laws. Within days, eight senators — led by Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., and Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska — fired off a letter to Sessions urging him to stand down and to stick with the Obama Justice Department policy, embodied in the so-called Cole memo (signed by former Deputy Attorney General James Cole) that, as a matter of prosecutorial discretion, urged U.S. attorneys to lay off legal pot dealers in states that have set up their own regulatory schemes to supervise them. Even as Sessions was about to sign his new memo earlier this month, four state governors (of Alaska, Colorado, Oregon and Washington) launched a preemptive strike, sending their own letter to Sessions and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin making a similar request. “As governors, we have committed to implementing the will of our citizens,” they wrote.


    “What we’ve seen is a lot of pushback from both sides of the aisle,” said Taylor West, communications director for the National Cannabis Industry Association, the major trade group for the country’s pot sellers. “A couple of times now, there have been statements coming out of the administration, from Sessions or Sean Spicer, that seemed ominous for legal marijuana programs. But when follow-up is done and questions are asked, there is not a clear statement of policy changes. The clearest thing to come out of these episodes is the opposition to the idea that they might change the policy.”

    So far, eight states (Alaska, California, Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts, Nevada, Oregon and Washington) and the District of Columbia have passed laws legalizing the recreational use of marijuana. Twenty-nine states plus the District of Columbia have medical marijuana laws. All this has led to a thriving, and steadily growing, domestic marijuana industry — meaning a new anti-pot crackdown would cost states tax revenue and jobs. A new study by Arcview, a market research firm, estimates there were $6.7 billion in sales of legal cannabis products in 2016, up 34 percent from the year before. Industry sales are projected to more than triple to $21.5 billion by 2021. The Arcview study notes that “there are only two obvious cases in recent decades” in which industries have experienced that kind of supercharged growth: “cable television in the 1980s … and broadband Internet access in the 2000s.”

    The marijuana surge has produced an increasingly potent pro-pot lobby in D.C.: West’s National Cannabis Industry Association, which represents 1,200 legal pot sellers, employs high-profile lobbyists (Hillary Clinton super-bundler Heather Podesta was until recently under contract), has its own political action committee and throws fundraisers at a tony Capitol Hill wine bar where a growing number of members of Congress show up to schmooze and collect campaign checks. When the group recently announced it would be holding its annual “lobby day” this year on May 16, more than 300 members signed up to fly in — more than twice as many as last year — to press the industry’s case on Capitol Hill.


    Part of this year’s pot industry “lobby day” agenda will be to play defense against any possible moves by Sessions. In the worst-case scenario, says West, the Justice Department could rescind the Cole memo and direct prosecutors to start “cherry-picking” businesses tied to the legalized pot trade — by suing landlords that lease to them, for example — or even raiding dealers themselves for violations of federal law. But she says her group’s members are not “panicking.” An even bigger part of this year’s agenda will be to play offense: pressing for changes in Treasury Department rules that would, for example, permit federally regulated banks to accept the business of marijuana dispensaries. (Right now, most won’t, out of fear of being accused of accepting income that is illicitly gained under federal law, forcing most dispensaries to do all their business in cash.)

    The other top-of-the-agenda item is the Curbelo-Blumenauer tax bill — a big-ticket issue for the legal weed industry. As a result of a 1981 court case involving a convicted cocaine trafficker, businesses involved in selling illegal drugs under the Internal Revenue Service code are barred from taking the same standard deductions — for rent, office equipment, depreciation and the like — that any other business does. The pot industry badly wants that changed — and Norquist and Curbelo have a strategy to help them do it: Push the measure as part of a tax overhaul package, arguing that the current rule is a job-killer that amounts to a “35 percent sales tax” on legal weed. “I do think it’s a candidate for inclusion,” said Curbelo, who conveniently sits on the Ways and Means Committee and is positioned to make it happen. “This legislation is without question consistent with the goal of Ways and Means Republicans of simplifying the tax code and making it more coherent and more fair.” (A similar bill has been introduced in the Senate by Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore.)

    Norquist even allows himself to hope that including the pot measure could bring some Democrats on board for a Trump tax reform bill. It may be far-fetched, but, Jeff Sessions notwithstanding, there are those who believe marijuana might turn out to be one issue on which a divided Washington can come together.
    http://www.yahoo.com/news/republican...092026350.html
    Trump's obvious lies make it impossible to believe anything he says that might be true. His presidency is falling apart fast.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    6,151
    Thanks
    851
    Thanked 959 Times in 806 Posts

    Default

    "...the sale and even possession of marijuana remains a federal crime..."

    So why doesn't he (Curbelo) or another congressman offer a bill to remove marijuana from the list of federal crimes? The duty of the AG is to prosecute violations of the Law.

    This isn't hard.

    You really don't want to live in a country where laws are arbitrarily enforced based on who is in political power....

    The solution is simple in a democracy....Put it to a vote.
    “You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong...You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves.” - Ronald Reagan
    "This is the issue of this election: Whether we believe in our capacity for self-government or whether we abandon the American revolution and confess that a little intellectual elite in a far-distant capitol can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves." Ronald Reagan (1964)

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Pondering For This Useful Post:

    smoky (04-19-2017)

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    lived in 5 states traveled extensively in Europe middle East and Asia.
    Posts
    14,680
    Thanks
    1,977
    Thanked 2,022 Times in 1,640 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Again Pondering offers us a conundrum, you strongly believe in states rights and yet just now you suggested that the federal government should over ride the states and make a final ruling on Marijuana? Already many states have taken the vote you suggest and those states have legalized either medical marijuana or recreational use.

    A true "states right" person would merely suggest that the federal government should leave those states alone, because they've made up their minds. Or a quite different issue comes up. Maybe Pondering really does not hold states rights as thoroughly as I thought he does, and there might be other issues which he cannot accept the principle of states rights. OK fess up Pondering, you really think there are limits to the idea of states rights.
    Trump's obvious lies make it impossible to believe anything he says that might be true. His presidency is falling apart fast.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Sirius B
    Posts
    10,494
    Thanks
    888
    Thanked 2,159 Times in 1,661 Posts

    Default

    It all starts with marijuana, then someone puts on swing music and you end up dancing with colored folk.
    ~ Jeff Sessons (satire).
    Won't you listen to reason .... Will you open your eyes

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to missy For This Useful Post:

    Hammerhead (04-20-2017)

  7. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    lived in 5 states traveled extensively in Europe middle East and Asia.
    Posts
    14,680
    Thanks
    1,977
    Thanked 2,022 Times in 1,640 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Does Sessions get all his Marijuana information by watching "Reefer Madness?"
    Trump's obvious lies make it impossible to believe anything he says that might be true. His presidency is falling apart fast.

  8. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Sirius B
    Posts
    10,494
    Thanks
    888
    Thanked 2,159 Times in 1,661 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Celeste View Post
    Does Sessions get all his Marijuana information by watching "Reefer Madness?"
    Cheech and Chong. Them filthy Mexicans.
    Won't you listen to reason .... Will you open your eyes

  9. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    6,151
    Thanks
    851
    Thanked 959 Times in 806 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Celeste View Post
    Again Pondering offers us a conundrum..
    Not really...

    Quote Originally Posted by Celeste View Post
    ...you strongly believe in states rights and yet...
    Generally true...I'm a strict constructionist....Federal powers are pretty clearly defined in Articles 1 and 2 and 3. The 10th Amendment says what to do in all other cases. Article 6 says that since the Federal Gov't has already made a rule about marijuana, it's the "Supreme Law of the Land"....

    "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding." (emphasis added)

    Quote Originally Posted by Celeste View Post
    ...just now you suggested that the federal government should over ride the states and make a final ruling on Marijuana?
    No...I'm not saying they should....I'm saying they have already done that....the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) (21 U.S.C. § 811).

    Quote Originally Posted by Celeste View Post
    Already many states have taken the vote you suggest and those states have legalized either medical marijuana or recreational use.
    And all of those state votes are irrelevant and un-Constitutional. Doesn't matter that they voted for "X"...it doesn't comply with Federal Law, which is Supreme. The Federal Gov't must change the law (the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) (21 U.S.C. § 811)) first....then the states would be free to do what they want (Article 10)....what has happened is nullification of Federal Law.

    Quote Originally Posted by Celeste View Post
    A true "states right" person would merely suggest that the federal government should leave those states alone...
    Which is exactly what I've argued here before....You choose to ignore the facts that a) there is already existing Federal Law in this area and b) the Constitution says that law trumps anything in any state's constitution or any state law.

    Quote Originally Posted by Celeste View Post
    ...because they've made up their minds.
    Then the Senators and Congressmembers of those states should put forward a bill to change the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) (21 U.S.C. § 811) to remove marijuana from the list of drugs identified on Schedule 1. It really is that simple. Why don't they?

    Quote Originally Posted by Celeste View Post
    ....Maybe Pondering really does not hold states rights as thoroughly as I thought he does....
    Maybe Celeste doesn't believe in the rule of law and the Constitution? Maybe Celeste prefers arbitrary enforcement of law...supporting the laws she supports and preferring to ignore the laws she doesn't like.....I'm just saying, that's a very dangerous path to be on....

    Quote Originally Posted by Celeste View Post
    ....and there might be other issues which he cannot accept the principle of states rights.
    I certainly accept the principle. More importantly, I accept the principle of the U.S. Constitution....in the case of marijuana, this has been addressed at the Federal level...not "fixing" that at that level first is the problem.

    Quote Originally Posted by Celeste View Post
    OK fess up Pondering, you really think there are limits to the idea of states rights.
    Yes there are. Article 6 clearly defines those limits. This isn't hard. The fact that liberals get a bad case of the "wants" doesn't change how this is supposed to work....and by ignoring how this is supposed to work, then it does further damage to the foundations of the entire system...

    If 21 states voted to ban abortion, only recognize same-sex marriage, or re-instate slavery, I doubt you'd be jumping on those bandwagons...You'd quickly point to the Constitution and Federal Law to say "you can't do that!".....that's the same position you should be taking in regards marijuana.....

    Don't want it to be a Federal Law and let it be resolved within the states? Cool. Me too. Amend the Federal Law and let her rip....until then however....Prosecute those in violation of Federal Law.
    “You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong...You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves.” - Ronald Reagan
    "This is the issue of this election: Whether we believe in our capacity for self-government or whether we abandon the American revolution and confess that a little intellectual elite in a far-distant capitol can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves." Ronald Reagan (1964)

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Pondering For This Useful Post:

    pastor2022 (04-20-2017), smoky (04-19-2017)

  11. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Blue Ridge Mountains
    Posts
    8,862
    Thanks
    2,211
    Thanked 1,259 Times in 1,051 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Celeste View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Pondering View Post
    "...the sale and even possession of marijuana remains a federal crime..."

    So why doesn't he (Curbelo) or another congressman offer a bill to
    remove marijuana from the list of federal crimes? The duty of the AG is to prosecute violations of the Law.

    This isn't hard.

    You really don't want to live in a country where laws are arbitrarily enforced based on who is in political power....

    The solution is simple in a democracy....Put it to a vote.
    Again Pondering offers us a conundrum, you strongly believe in states rights and yet just now you suggested that the federal government should over ride the states
    Non-responsive pathetic dodge. . .fails to address the merits of the argument itself.

    To the argument: it is no different than the Federal Government "overriding" in discrimination laws, clean-air laws, endangered species laws, etc., etc., etc. . .it's Constitutional. . .which you do not value.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •