Most Accurate Bible Version

[Philip]

Also, what does spiritually inerrant mean in light of John 6:63 where the words are spirit?

As you pointed out; the words that Jesus Christ speaks are spirit and they are life. So, by emphasizing the spiritual and doctrinal preservation of his words, even if there were such a thing as copyist errors; I felt that God had done what he promised.

The Lord got on my case yesterday about my questioning and presentations in this thread and I had to repent. It was a very unpleasant few hours - especially during my devotion time. But, in His mercy, He reminded me that I'm a son, and every son will receive chastening from a loving Father. So, I receive with joy and now refuse to bring those types of questions up about his word in a public forum such as this. I believe the words of the Lord; I trust them completely; I think we would all be lost without them. So praise God for his holy word - The Bible.

Why doyou use the term B.C.E.?

Funny you should mention that. As I was typing, it went through my head - why are you typing that! I have specifically avoided using it; even in my science work; just to give honor to the Lord Jesus Christ. You're right BC/AD is still the best way to go; inspite of the "modern" world.

[Led By The Master]

Alright, so you are saying that none of the variants are significant at all? Do you believe the TR manuscripts, any one of them, to be the perfect, inerrant, infallible, pure and preserved words of God to this generation?

The variants were not in the words themselves. From what I have read, the words were consistently agreeable with one another throughout all of the TR manuscripts.

God promised to preserve His Word, did He not? If we lost the originals, and the copies were full of error, then we have no assurance that we have the Word of God; unless, as I have said, the words were indeed preserved (as I believe they were) and the variants have no bearing on what man was originally given by inspiration of God.

[Linda67]

Alright, so you are saying that none of the variants are significant at all? Do you believe the TR manuscripts, any one of them, to be the perfect, inerrant, infallible, pure and preserved words of God to this generation?

My response to this is here:

http://forum.bible-discussion.com/sh...674#post263674

[bibleman7]

The variants were not in the words themselves. From what I have read, the words were consistently agreeable with one another throughout all of the TR manuscripts.

God promised to preserve His Word, did He not? If we lost the originals, and the copies were full of error, then we have no assurance that we have the Word of God; unless, as I have said, the words were indeed preserved (as I believe they were) and the variants have no bearing on what man was originally given by inspiration of God.

I have a few variants in the TR texts at home that I may bring up. But I have a similiar question to you. If the King James is perfect (and you and I both believe that as far as I know), you can only have one final authority. IF the KJV and the TR were to disagree, where is your final authority?

[Led By The Master]

I have a few variants in the TR texts at home that I may bring up. But I have a similiar question to you. If the King James is perfect (and you and I both believe that as far as I know), you can only have one final authority. IF the KJV and the TR were to disagree, where is your final authority?

They don't disagree.

[bibleman7]

They don't disagree.

Have you ever heard of anyone correcting the KJV with the TR?

[Led By The Master]

Have you ever heard of anyone correcting the KJV with the TR?

No, but I have seen many try to correct it with Aleph and B.

[Bug]

Check Psalm 83:18. Make sure it says the name of God, not replaced by 'the LORD'. That's nothing like God's name!

That men may know that you, whose name alone is JEHOVAH, are the most high over all the earth.

Check Luke 23:43. Make sure the comma comes after the word today. Jesus did not go to Paradise the day He died! (read Luke 24, John 20:17, John 21, Acts 1)

And he said to him: “Truly I tell you today, You will be with me in Paradise.”

That's a start...

And make sure Isaiah 42:8 has God's name, not Lord. Lord is not God's name...

[Bug]

And make sure Psalm 110:1 has God's name in it, and, by extension because it is a direct quote of Psalm 110:1, make sure Matthew 22:44 also has God's name in it!

This is Psalm 110:1 in Hebrew.
לדוד מזמור נאם יהוה לאדני שׁב לימיני עד־אשׁית איביך הדם לרגליך׃

This is Matthew 22:44 in the Hebrew New Testament.
נאם יהוה לאדני שב לימיני עד־אשית איביך הדם לרגליך׃

יהוה is, of course, the tetragrammaton, the vowelless name of God.

[Bubba]

Bug

And make sure Psalm 110:1 has God's name in it, and, by extension because it is a direct quote of Psalm 110:1, make sure Matthew 22:44 also has God's name in it!

This is Psalm 110:1 in Hebrew.
לדוד מזמור נאם יהוה לאדני שׁב לימיני עד־אשׁית איביך הדם לרגליך׃

This is Matthew 22:44 in the Hebrew New Testament.
נאם יהוה לאדני שב לימיני עד־אשית איביך הדם לרגליך׃

יהוה is, of course, the tetragrammaton, the vowelless name of God.

Now the next thing that you are going to tell us is that you can read these squiggley lines.

Bubba